Amazon warns workers to come back into the office::This week, a reminder email was sent to employees who didn’t work on-site at least three times a week.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not that it’s hurting them, but they’re permanently on my list of places I won’t even think about working. Everything I hear about their culture is just awful. It’s hard to imagine fellow tech professionals being browbeaten in all the ways I hear about, whipped like cattle. Just terrible. As long as I have other choices I’ll just steer miles around them, thank you very much.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Who the fuck even wants to work there anymore. It sounds like hell but people still sign up.

  • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    I haven’t looked into why they’re doing this, so maybe this insight is obvious and well known, but I imagine it has to do with the fact that they spend a shitton of money on these spaces/leases that they can’t easily get out of, so their way of dealing with it is by forcing employees to use it. My company is going through a similar situation, but they’re accepting the responsibility of eating the cost of the office space lease with several years left on the contract and don’t even try to entice people to use it. “Come in if you want, it’s going to be here for awhile!” is about as far as it goes, haha. Fuck Amazon.

    • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not certain, but I remember hearing companies like that get tax incentives to move to certain areas to boost jobs. I wonder if maybe that affects it? Landlords want their rent, and local businesses sell stuff to commuters. But I think we should just turn all the commercial not being used into residential

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      What drives me nuts about my job, although it’s better than no WFH at all so I stick with it, is that I have a hybrid home/office schedule when there’s zero need for me to ever come in and the space will be used anyway because I’m in the office part of an industrial facility. In fact, if they got rid of the office, they could put in more machinery. Seems like a win-win. But they don’t see it that way for some reason.

    • noahm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I doubt it. When companies lay people off, they want to be able to choose who they let go. They don’t have that choice here. No well-managed company will value “works in the office” over “gets shit done”.

      • masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 years ago

        Have you ever experienced a layoff? I have. They are usually very random. Higher ups rarely have any idea who should be kept and who should be let go.

      • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The rule is in place so that they have a leg to stand on for letting people go with cause. When good workers don’t show up, they might get a performance improvement plan, but their managers will find a way to not enforce it. When the rest of the workforce doesn’t show up, those folks will be let go.