• bpcomp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was briefly confused how an open source flashlight firmware had anything to do with this… then I noticed this post wasn’t in the Flashlight forum. So apparently Anduril is a war contractor AND a great flashlight firmware but are not related at all.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, Anduril the company has been around for a minute (Since 2017). Luckey got in early on selling weapons tech to the government after he sold Oculus.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just don’t like something intended for war being called Anduril. They’ve missed JRRT’s point completely.

  • sir_pronoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Iirc IVAS made like 50% of soldiers nauseous to the point of throwing up. So let’s shoot some more billions at this, sure

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Microsoft was doing the headset? Did they have clippy asking who the soldier wanted to kill that day? Maybe mid-combat blue screens to blind the user? Oh wait, a forced update while it was supposed to determine the trajectory of an incoming mortar…

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The problem it’s trying to solve is “How do we make ungodly amounts of money as ‘Defense Contractors’?”

      To be genuinely fair, this sort of waste is part and parcel to the US Military.

      • felixwhynot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For sure. Head mounted displays are useful for, say, technical repairs. And I see the value as an alternative to the F35 helmet. But besides that … for infantry? Idk. Wishful thinking IMHO

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is pretty much the story of the entire Land Warrior program. Nobody ever expected it to be a Real Thing, it was always a pie-in-the-sky boondoggle to make a shitload of money for the MIC.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s made by the same kind of techbros who are angry that the “future doesn’t look like the future”, that got us the Cybertruck and the other recent Tesla abominations.

      When artists/writers design future tech for their cyberpunk dystopia, coolness is a greater factor than usability, especially as most creators don’t have much experience with product design. I just go with the “rule of cool” and aesthetics, even in cases where stuff would look obsolete by today’s standards, because some powerful people in the tech industry decided everything must be touchscreens and voice commands.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    On the one hand, glad to see MS get out of this, I don’t think the tech is nearly mature enough to work on the battlefield especially on the software side. I’ve worn the v1 IVAS and developed on hololens, there are definite use cases but - full battle rattle? no. For critical applications something like this must be combat hard and it’s nowhere near ready.

    eh that said anduril is fucking evil tho…