• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is like the dozenth time Google put hallucinations in their AI presentation/AD. They just don‘t care.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially considering that the “pointing out of said hallucinations” comes much later than when they’re shared. And NEVER made it as far and wide as the initial bullshit.

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You put a few GPTs in a trenchcoat and they’re obviously AI. I can’t speak about openAIs offerings since I won’t use it as a cloud service, but local deepseek I’ve tried is certainly AI. People are moving the goalposts constantly, with what seems to me a determination to avoid seeing the future that’s already here. Download deepseek-v2-coder 16b if you have 16GB of ram and 10gb of storage space and see for yourselves, it’s ridiculously low requirements for what it can do, it uses 50% of four cpu cores for like 15 seconds to solve a problem with detailed reasoning steps.

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Slightly off topic, but the writing on this article is horrible. Optimizing for Google engagement, it seems. Ironically, an AI would probably have produced something vastly more readable.

  • Hackworth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Flames burn and smoke asphyxiates, perfectly highlighting why relying on fire is a bad idea.