• rozlav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The ps5 controller is designed into the game, hard to believe this will be available pc anytime soon

    • falidorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is a disingenuous take. All games require hardware and you definitely don’t need to spend $600 to play it.

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah its not none but it is low. They did a great job making the ps4 and dualshock 4 feel lesser comparatively.

        • falidorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          You pay $400 for it new or buy a used digital system for less. Sony even sells a refurbished disc version for $400 if you are weirdly stuck on physical (since I assume you don’t buy it that way with your current gaming hardware). Do you also quote the highest possible price for a cellphone or a pc?

          • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes you are right, paying $400 for a game is of course very much reasonable.

            • falidorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, you chose your medium for playing games. The same thing exists for a lot of games. I’m quite sure you paid at least that to game in your platform of choice.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Considering I’d have a PC regardless, no. My GPU is the only thing that’s really “gaming specific,” and I pay about $200-300 per console generation for an upgrade, and I’d still need something for display out regardless.

  • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It DID outdo Nintendo’s equivalent - the previous mainline Mario entry - Super Mario Odyssey - in every way except maybe 4 :

    1. Quantity - Mario had more moons than Astro had Bots to rescue… so more collectibles.
    2. replayability - with the Luigi balloon challenges, they extended the game’s longevity with this feature and it is better than Astro Bot’s simpler “speed run challenges” because of Mario’s unique game mechanic of allowing players to create and compete by crafting one-of-a-kind challenges for each other.
    3. Nostalgia - Mario’s New Donk City party was absolute peak love letter to the origins of Super Mario and the sequence with the song sung by Mayor Pauline honestly brought me to tears…
    Tap for spoiler

    the Bowser hat body takeover sequence

    …But everything else - the scale of and pure ingenuity of the boss mechanics, the visuals - from both a stylistic and technical standpoint, the Dual-Sense’s controller gimmicks, the complete lack of load times… it brought into stark contrast how far Nintendo has fallen behind - not so much from a game design perspective necessarily - but certainly at least from a hardware power standpoint.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Astro Bot from what I’ve seen - and played a bit of - is more similar to Mario Galaxy in level design and that game is maybe the best 3D Mario.