• SS2k_2003@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    The democrats have an elitism problem, their party doesn’t appeal to the average American even though their policies do. The candidates they run tend to appeal more to college educated persons but far less to those who don’t hold post-secondary degrees. Their policies also often times don’t do enough to actually help the average person and lack universality which is desperately needed as the economy continues to get worse and every day life continues to get harder. They refuse to acknowledge this and continue to lose as a result.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      All the democratic policies always came with means testing. I always supported all their stuff but it rarely helped me or people I know because of the means testing.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      The democrats have an elitism problem, their party doesn’t appeal to the average American even though their policies do. The candidates they run tend to appeal more to college educated persons but far less to those who don’t hold post-secondary degrees.

      People love simple answers to problems. Unfortunately, the problems we’re facing are incredibly complex and don’t have simple realistic answers. Simply looking solutions have complicated consequences that aren’t immediately obvious. The average American (that doesn’t hold post-secondary education) typically doesn’t understand this. So when a problem is explained and a solution that addresses it is presented, it usually leaves them confused.

      Their policies also often times don’t do enough to actually help the average person

      …not enough help, I agree.

      and lack universality which is desperately needed as the economy continues to get worse and every day life continues to get harder.

      You lost on me on this one. Universality? As in a living minimum wage that would benefit not only those struggling on the poverty line, but also help billionaires?

      They refuse to acknowledge this and continue to lose as a result.

      This is where I more strongly disagree. This goes back to my first point.

      We’re facing very complex problems that don’t have simple answers. However, the other side is providing simple to understand solutions. The problem is those simple solutions are horrendous, and aren’t actually solutions. Example:

      • Americans are struggling with low wages. The other side says its because of foreigners and moves to arrest and deport them. Simple right? Except you and I both know the low wages has nothing to do with immigrants, and instead on corporate America and captured politicians keeping wages low while productivity continues to rise.

      If the other side simply gives simple “common sense” solutions that a typical American understands (even if its wrong), then that will be appealing to them instead of a realistic complex solution which promises far fewer benefits. What are Democrats to do here that can counter the infinite depth of lies of the other side?

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your post reminded me of the saying (paraphrasing from memory) “to every complicated problem there is an answer that is easy, simple, and wrong.”

        Everyone bemoans government inefficiency and slowness without understanding that “that’s the point”. Legislation in a democracy is hard and compromise is necessary. The slowness is a feature not a bug. Yes it means some good things will be delayed, or not implemented as well as some may like, but a lot of bad shit is avoided as well.