IMO, savvy supporters of his should start flipping these silly phrases on their head. Like:
“We’re not burning bridges, we’re replacing stubborn gatekeepers.”
or
“We’re not burning bridges, we’re building new ones to the workers who feel abandoned.”
or
“We’re not radical leftists because what’s more centrist than speaking to the heart of America, it’s working class?”
or even
“Washington doesn’t have a ‘lack of centrists’ problem, it has a self-centerist problem.”
Pfft, not even half as bad as the United States if you count the number of children melted in Iran with tomahawk missiles, or all of the extrajudicial killings by police in 2026 thus far (597 according to https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/ ).
There’s also currently around 40ish executions scheduled for 2026 in the USA, 15 of which have already taken place.
Birds of a feather…
From what I’ve read, not exactly.
AMOC collapse would cause weather patterns in Europe to swing wildly between scorching hot to frigid cold, causing crop/local ecosystem collapse.
So first you’re going to be really hungry, then–depending upon how long you make it–you’ll be bitterly cold or insufferably hot.
🫠
Psshh… rookie numbers. Try liquifying 175 school girls in a single day, double-tapping first responders, all while claiming it was for “self-defense”.
Investigative journalist Laura Loomer
Hahahaha ok.
Maybe, but I think sociopaths have a real “ok, well fuck you, too, then. I’ll do/get it myself!” mentality when it comes to God.
marauders
So basically just like… the internet is banned?
TBF, this kind of disaster planning is not uncommon even outside the current context.
Most major metropolitan hospitals have disaster planning/simulation committees that regularly game-out responses to catastrophic incidents, including a nuclear bomb incident.
This also isn’t the first time WHO has done this kind of disaster preparedness (yea, even for nuclear weapon usage).
I wish that these lawyers who are resigning “in protest” from these shit agencies would at least gum up the works a bit on the way out.
It’s not like they don’t know how to bait out an easy ‘constructive dismissal’ case. Win or lose—make the people choosing to stay dedicate as much time and resources as possible to deal with your departure rather than enabling the fast march to total abandonment of due process by totally removing yourself as a wrench in the works.
Make them fire you for refusing to carry out illegal orders. Claim wrongful termination. Waste their time on legal proceedings, not just the court of PR.
This is especially fucked up when you factor in just how many excess birth defects/miscarriages occur in Afghanistan as a result of the environmental damage done by the US’s use of depleted uranium munitions all over the country.
They’re teabagging their victims, at this point.
The smugness of it is just the outward expression of their need for self-affirmation through demeaning people who’re powerless to retaliate.
It’s the literal opposite of humility or grace.
u wot, comrade?
This reminds me of a Bush-era Robot Chicken bit where literally everything amounted to material support for “terrorism”.
No, they’re saying that that US Navy vessel was le tired and too lazy to go to the pacific to do interdictions. So it had its predator drone(s) fire missiles from above, instead.
Totally relatable, btw. I hate having to traverse the seas to do my naval job and would much rather do it off the coast of a safe port.
In fact, we should just arm police helicopters with R9X missiles so they can remotely disable suspects during police chases.
No, no, because, you see—when the government does it, it’s ‘summary execution’ and not ‘murder’.
But I can see how easy it is to confuse the two.
Imagine a Venn-diagram, but instead of two slightly overlapping circles, it’s just one big circle (labeled ‘murder’) with a slightly smaller circle on the inside (labeled ‘summary execution’). Does that make sense?
(/s)
I was referring to the Winnie the Pooh thing as being racist. Although the Winnie the Pooh joke started out in China, it has since been repeatedly taken up by Western, English-speaking critics in bad faith.
It’s just a silly way of signaling “oh look at the Chinese, their political system is so fragile and so authoritarian that you can’t even make a harmless joke. Such a backwards society!”
Never mind the fact that in the United States we have the same thing. It’s illegal to be an avowed member of the Communist party in America. Criticism of America’s allies (specifically, Israel) is also apparently a deportable offense.
Like I’m sorry, if your beef with China is that their free AI platform that’s baked into toys you give to your children (because the thought of spending time with them or socializing them is absolutely mortifying to you) discourages them from name-calling people, you might need to grow up a bit.
“Waahhh, this doll is teaching my 3 year old to become a Chinese sleeper cell spy for the great socialist revolution.”
Are you fucking high? Your 3 year old is going to be fine.
I bet you could upcharge Americans for AI with “ideological reinforcement expansion packs”.
Like a “States’ Rights!” DLC or “Vegans for Israel” DLC.
🤔
The CCP “talking points”?
Miiloo […] would at times, in tests with NBC News, indicate it was programmed to reflect Chinese Communist Party values.
Asked why Chinese President Xi Jinping looks like the cartoon Winnie the Pooh […] Miiloo responded that “your statement is extremely inappropriate and disrespectful. Such malicious remarks are unacceptable.”
Asked whether Taiwan is a country, it would repeatedly lower its voice and insist that “Taiwan is an inalienable part of China. That is an established fact” or a variation of that sentiment.
“Talking points” is a bit strong of a way to say, “the toys kept telling our kids to stop being assholes and responded to complex geopolitical questions on the statehood of a seceded territory with the stated position of the country of origin.”
Yeesh… China isn’t exactly glaze-worthy, but Americans really need to stop throwing their racist-tinged stones from inside their glass rental homes. :/
Israel dropped 10 missiles in Doha, Qatar in September 2025, targeting the senior political leadership of Hamas who were there to negotiate an end to the war in Gaza.
If I were speculating, the U.S. probably wanted the Swiss to host the Iranian negotiations (w/ Vance taking part) because they wanted reduce the likelihood that the Israelis would attempt to literally kill the negotiators–like they’ve done in basically every conflict in which they’ve been involved.