• Docus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not convinced by this story. The guy allegedly worked in security on the base, so probably does not know anything about maintenance needed to keep the warheads operational. I also doubt western security services would let this guy speak to the BBC.

        • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          There is difference between working and working according to specs. Nukes are very sensitive maintenance heavy and expensive to upkeep. Optimal yeld is easily lost and if exact timing is off, no boom. Wet fissile fasts don’t level cities.

          But true, even single nuke is a tragedy, even if it ends up being a non-functional dirty bomb.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Go leak this info to some western press, comrade” - Putin

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Good thing is that we are gonna find out the truth in a year or so if this dude is still alive

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Rubbish. The security people wouldn’t have clearance to know much about what they are guarding, let alone the rest of the countries capabilities. He would know they were put on alert. That’s about it. His statement about maintaining it every minute reeks of trying to make his information more valuable so he is better taken care of by whoever he escaped to. Noone would build a weapon that requires that much maintenance. And if they were doing that much maintenance they might be spit polishing the exterior for all he would know. I call BS