• s38b35M5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you are willing to use Signal, you already don’t mind a tiny userbase, so why not use Session (or maybe Matrix) and enjoy privacy, security, AND anonymity?

    Signal has always been clear that privacy!=anonymity and regards people who want both as both stupid and unusual. Its always been a weird dance to watch.

    • eating3645@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because the ux for signal is superior and I don’t care about anonymity when I’m communicating with friends and family.

      The right tool for the right job, and signal is the right tool for general communication, but I wouldn’t use it for my virtual pals.

      Essentially, I see entirely different use cases for decentralized options like matrix, session, xmpp.

    • Srootus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The concern with Session is that theyre based in Australia, a country that is in the 5 eyes, and their government passed a bill forces companies to provide a backdoor when ordered to, the company cannot deny to create this, and they can’t declose that they got ordered to ether. [A great video talking about said bill] While the Session devs say their services are resilient to these threats, [see their FAQ] it’s best to remain cautious.