At this point I’m wondering, does the guillotine needs to be sharp or should we use the dull one ?
Dull af. And not quite high enough.
Notice how he isn’t saying just that he needs more, just that he wants us to have less. This isn’t a message for us, it’s a plea for the ram manufacturers to further squeeze the supply and reinforce their monopoly for the cloud of the future where you just rent computing from them. I don’t think so buddy, fuck off
Should be pretty easy to get Trump to agree to setting up another goon squad to go to people’s houses and just take whatever computers they have. No compensation or legal recourse, of course. It’s for the greater good.
This guy is really trying to piss people off with his stupid fucking ideas and acting like he should lead humanity into his vision of the future.
Apparently Facebook forbids saying you hope someone gets a disease, gets killed by a natural disaster, dies without a specific perpetrator or method, or gets smited by a deity or absence thereof…no joke.
Anyway, I don’t want to step on the wrong side of our cyberlords /s so I’ll just say this:
Fuck Sam Altman. I hope he sees that no one likes him, his ideas are dumber than AI generated slop, his parents left his stroller in the sun too long, and I hope he eats some South American beef.
I hope he eats an illegally prepared fugu sandwich
With cone snail sauce <3
God that guy needs to be punched in the face.
God that guy needs to be
punchedguillotined in thefaceneck.Certainly, but also needs to be punched in the face first.
And after.
Ok Sam, give your computers up first and then we will negotiate.
I hate the idea of Sam Altman not being in prison
Rich people are safe and comfortable in prison, and their influence slips through the bars
I prefer putting him in a certain prison…
The prison that he had been in before he was born
Well then all the more reason to not pay for CrapGPT and run inference locally
I use it regularly but only for free, in hopes that I contribute to the burning of their profits
Ask it some silly nonsense shit
So we’d own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.
Gosh, who’d’a thunkit? Never saw that one coming.
So we’d own a basic terminal, and pay a subscription for our computing needs.
No.
We would rent a proprietary terminal that also needs a paid subscription to a computing service.
Sam Altman has lost the plot.
His own model of LLM isn’t sustainable or profitable, where the local software model us.
And the economy isn’t there just to make Sam Altman richer.
This is (another) Let them eat cake moment in which another spoiled aristocrat has lost touch with the common people.
Yeah with open models catching up and giving reasonable results in consumer grade setups, they are gonna go full on with “unregulated AI is too dangerous we should only allow hardware gated LLMs”.
It is so funny this guy is the CEO of a company called openAI lol.
And that sentiment will come from the same people that just removed reverse-engineering from the common folk, reserving that power for specific companies and government entities. https://tbreak.com/claude-opus-5-5-reverse-engineering-restricted/
O gooddie a new little fascist boy. Who could have guessed.
subscription models are a scam.
"We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity, and people buy it from us on a meter,” - Sam Altman
Devoid of soul he is.
Sci-fi has been warning us about exactly this type of maglomaniac and the future they want to control for as long as I can remember.
yeah we all had it on our bingo cards so I guess we all win on this one.
Ignoring the warnings is hardly a win.
Not even ironically.
So is he gonna redistribute his wealth? Cause ya know? Wealth hoarding is terrible and the people hoarding wealth (Sam Altman) should have to redistribute their wealth because that money could be better used to serve the people, right? In fact all billionaires and trillionaires should be engaging in wealth redistribution, right?
If we’re gonna agree from a general consensus agreement POV why not make him give us his money because I mean if people owning computers is hurting the worldwide Ai industry, then clearly the wealth hoarding hurting the global economy can be solved simply by someone telling others to engage in redistribution, right?
Division of labor implies those best at making money should do so for the group.
Others will make food, clothing, shelter, and funny quips.
No, you missed what I was getting at entirely.
If the global chip supply is going down that fast that he’s saying in so many words that everyone who’s owning a computer is owning an potential independent data center and that they should sacrifice and redistribute their ram for the good of the global corporate data centers.
Now, if there’s a global economic indifference because the people like Altman, Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates and Musk are hoarding the world’s wealth, shouldn’t they redistribute their wealth for the good of the global economy?
I was also saying, that thinking that it’s gonna be as easy as just telling people to engage in either forms of redistribution is just asinine.
