Just a reminder that Federal Law shields people who sell guns from liability over the just as inevitable consequences of that industry.
I don’t think it would shield an illegal gun seller if that gun was used by someone to kill someone else.
If Perry had been given a legal prescription and still died by abusing it, I don’t think Walgreens would be facing charges.
The distinction here isn’t “gun” vs “drug” it is “legal sale” vs “illegal sale”.
My analogy is apt because both guns and drugs are dangerous and our society treats the things very differently for arbitrary cultural bullshit.
Pointing out that legally, guns are OK doesn’t contradict my point, it furthers it.
Pointing out that legally, guns are OK doesn’t contradict my point, it furthers it.
Does it? I’m not sure I’m following what your point is.
our society treats the things very differently for arbitrary cultural bullshit.
Well, yeah. That’s just how different groups of humans consider things that can be dangerous. You can go to any hardware store and by arsenic as rat poison. You can go to any drug store and buy eye drops. Both are lethal to humans when ingested yet both are easily accessible without any licensing or age restrictions.
Most countries also consider alcohol (ethyl alcohol) legal to purchase by adults (but definition of adult varies depending on the group of humans). Many would rightfully argue alcohol is more dangerous than some illegal narcotics.
If you’re looking for consistency in human behavior across society I’m not sure you’d going to find it very often.
Why couldn’t it have been Musk? Doesn’t he do this drug?
Headline set to the tune of ‘carribean queen’
