A U.S. senator sent a cryptic letter to the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, conveying alarm about the agency’s operations.

On Wednesday, Sen. Ron Wyden — an Oregon Democrat who serves on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence — posted a brief letter addressed to CIA Director John Ratcliffe, drawing his attention to an earlier “classified” message.

“I write to alert you to a classified letter I sent you earlier today, in which I express deep concerns about CIA activities,” Wyden wrote. “Thank you for your attention to this important matter.”

It’s not clear what activities — whether at home or abroad — Wyden was referring to. A representative for his office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Independent.

“During recent congressional briefings, CIA earned bicameral, bipartisan praise for its historic contributions and widespread recognition of the Agency’s exceptional performance under Director Ratcliffe,” CIA Spokesperson Liz Lyons told The Independent. “Ironic but unsurprising that Senator Wyden is unhappy. Badge of honor.”

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      “Given the current administration’s approach to, well, everything, the possibilities are unfortunately vast,” Masnick said. “Is it about domestic surveillance? Something about current [Office of the Director of National Intelligence] Tulsi Gabbard? International operations gone sideways? Some new interpretation of the CIA’s authorities that would make Americans’ hair stand on end if they knew about it? We’re left guessing, just like we were guessing about the PATRIOT Act’s secret interpretation back in 2011.”

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      I can’t remember which book it was, but I remember reading that there was allegedly a more liberal faction within the CIA at one point that was at odds with the conservative faction, but not sure how much truth there is to that.

      I think since around the time the patriot act was passed (?) the president has appointed the director, so the CIA is generally going to align with the sitting president’s politics. The director Trump chose to lead the CIA for his second term previously attempted to pass a bill to get rid of the Chevron deference while he was a congressman in TX.

      The bill failed, but SCOTUS conveniently overturned Chevron in 2024. Which means less federal oversight for Chevron and other corporations now that Trump is in office. The CIA, under Trump’s director has now invaded Venezuela and overthrown Maduro, which will allow more profits for Chevron (before the invasion they had an agreement that allowed the Venezuelan government the majority of their profits) and the CIA is establishing a permanent base in Venezuela.

      I doubt the CIA was ever doing ultra wholesome shit under Obama or Biden, but going to war and invading foreign countries for oil seems to be standard conservative policy in the same vein as the Bush/Cheney legacy.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Hurr de durr if we’re so corrupt then why come we keep patting ourselves on the back for not being the deep state while simultaneously starting a bunch of unjust wars to profit from oil and taking a shit on the constitution?” 🤔

    “Oh, yeah! Becuz da best don’t gotta answer 2 nobody but God, and God said he wanted us to drill baby drill!” 👷‍♀️ 🖕🖕