What do you think?

I think in the face of AI taking over many tasks, we need to rethink about how we frame the future of society. Reframing Universal Basic Income as Automation Compensation means presenting the policy as a way to make up for jobs and income lost due to automation and AI. Instead of viewing UBI as a general welfare payment, it becomes seen as compensation paid to everyone for the value automation creates, supporting those whose work is replaced by machines and helping everyone share in productivity gains. Especially in the US, the average person doesn’t like the idea of someone getting something that they’re personally not receiving. So framing it as a compensation that everyone receives regardless of employment status I think is the only feasible way forward.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    What I’ve seen as the most talked about part of this is, how are we going to pay for it. Of course, wealth tax has to be a huge part of it. We’ve seen the following work, so it’s not hard to understand. The billionaires don’t want it:

    • Social Security, but the companies only are the ones to foot the bill
    • Alaska dividends, same concept but of course, a lot more money.
    • Medicare, Medicaid and people on disability.
    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just from the top of my head:

      • Permanent tax on corporations that layoff people until they rehire to the same level.
      • An exise tax on AI use by businesses.

      Both of these would of course get me labeled an antichrist by Peter Thiel. And since AI is propping up the world economy right now, has 0 chance of happening.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Fine, then no company will ever expand their staff. Can’t risk a downturn a ways down the road.

        You’ve invented a new way to increase unemployment. :)

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Dude, every company that thought AI could take over a job, they tried it. Do you think they’re trying to keep employees?

        • Botzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Companies lay people off when the stock doesn’t grow the right way, even when they’re highly profitable.

          The Jack Welch playbook has fucked the concept of business success so hard we can’t even recognize what a huge pile of shit it has become. It needs a reset.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not enough available to tax to pull this off. BUT, when you factor in dropping all other social services, now we’re a lot closer.