• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    29 days ago

    Remember when everybody was making “smart” toasters and fridges and shit with cameras or WiFi for absolutely no reason.

    This is that all over again.

    Nobody needs “AI” in their water kettles, dryers, or dildos.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      But if I don’t have a toilet AI how will I remember what I had to eat the other day for less than $4.99/mo?

    • anus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      I gave you the up vote because it’s a good take, but this really has nothing to do with the article, so I can tell that you and a bunch of your 58 up voters didn’t read it

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I did read it, and my comment is exactly referencing the attitude of the author which is “It’s good enough, so you should use it”. I disagree, and say it’s another dumbass shortcut to cash grab on a less than stellar ecosystem and product. It’s training wheels for failure.

    • anus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      This is a pretty good take imo

      Like AI, IoT is an important and lasting technology

      But too many businesses and products jumped on a misguided bandwagon to pull stupid uniformed VC money

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Developers are resentful toward AI for the same reason they resented blockchain–it becomes a buzz word that every middle manager is convinced will improve productivity, and it’s forced whether it’s actually helpful or not.

    I work on safety-critical code. AI is useless here, but we have to “use” it to appease clueless shareholders.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    29 days ago

    Developers all love to preen about code. They worry LLMs lower the “ceiling” for quality. Maybe. But they also raise the “floor”.

    And this is how the human element of this industry dies. This dev is the last of a dying breed, the senior dev. He’s also loading more bullets into the gun that’s pointed at the heart of the role that got him to where he is in the first place.

    You don’t get to become a junior dev if that role is occupied by AI and you don’t get to ever ascend to senior dev unless you start as a junior dev.

    For as analytical this person seems to be, he has a massive blindspot related to the path he himself treaded to get where he is. He’s pulling the ladder up behind him and condemning the people on the path behind to finding another way or giving up entirely.

    AI is brain rot. It’s actively and aggressively atrophying humanity’s ability to reason and problem solve.

    • anus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      If this dev doesn’t do it, the next one will

      This dev is analytical enough to understand basic incentive modeling and game theory. Capitalism is a race to the bottom no less now than it always was.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Copilot in Code is hell. It pops code suggestions almost after every keystroke. Idiotic suggestions mostly.