Google is offering a far more pared-down solution to the court’s ruling that it illegally monopolized search

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can we just stop and appreciate for a moment what a fucking outrage it is that Google is allowed to negotiate its own punishment at all?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish I could get found guilty and still be able to negotiate on equal footing with the prosecution about what my punishment was going to be.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Chrome is the exact thing they shouldn’t keep. Their main weapon together with the search engine.

    Anything but Chrome.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’d be cool if at some point in the future Android and their Advertisement business were forced to split. Be a dream if they had to make Android open source again like it used to be.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        IMHO that kind of advertisement business should be plain illegal. There are parts of it which are cheating, ultimately aimed at plausible deniability for “pay to be recommended” stuff. And what’s not cheating there, is something worse - commercial surveillance.

        Advertisement relates to competition for customer’s attention the same way as lying relates to competition for listener’s approval. It’s just harmful.

  • brie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s a miracle that Google botched messengers, Google+, cloud ('member app engine?). They could have been even more dominant. I still like them more than MS and FB.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Normally I would laugh at them offering to resolve a second case to avoid judgement in the first one, but sadly they probably have enough influence to make it happen.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Chrome, as the damn-near-monopoly rendering engine, gives Google hegemony over web standards. That’s incredibly valuable because it puts them in a position to (e.g.) inflict DRM on the world.

  • Electric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get the boner the feds have for making Google sell Chrome. Maintaining a browser looks like a huge investment and as bad as Google is, there are much worse companies that would jump at the chance to buy it. Imagine some Tencent-tier corporation making you pay to have the ability to install extensions.